Five-minute video briefs of the leading U.S. Supreme Court and other selected patent and trademark decisions — the facts, the question presented, what the Court held, and the rule each case stands for.
Hikma v. Amarin (2026)
A unanimous Supreme Court held that Amarin failed to state a claim that Hikma induced infringement of its method-of-use…
Dewberry v. Dewberry (2025)
A unanimous Supreme Court vacated a $43 million trademark award, holding that a “defendant’s profits” award under…
Vidal v. Elster (2024)
The “TRUMP TOO SMALL” case. The Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act’s names clause — barring registration of a mark…
Abitron v. Hetronic (2023)
The Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act’s infringement provisions are not extraterritorial: infringing “use in…
These videos are educational case briefs, not legal advice, and watching them does not create an attorney-client relationship with the presenter or the firm. Case law and its interpretation evolves, always check a decision's subsequent history. Do not rely on these case briefs, but read the case yourself or have your attorney read them. Videos are presented via an AI avatar and voice clone of John Goodhue, created with his participation and consent.